tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15137028.post3883629940814654113..comments2010-02-28T01:05:25.890+01:00Dennis Doomenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04363006875303293621noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15137028.post-46919330983835993262010-02-28T01:05:25.890+01:002010-02-28T01:05:25.890+01:00Dennis, thanks for taking the time to post your thoughts. We would love to provide better mocking support. Have you considered mocking DomainClient for #1? Perhaps it might be cleaner since it is stateless. On #3, we would love to provide such a capability in a future version. It is tricky in general since there is often no support for &quot;deleted since&quot; queries in databases/other stores. Of course we can ferry all the IDs from client to mid-tier to store. But that has its own down-side.<br />On #2, we have basically a value-based model of association on the client which relies on FKs to ensure bidirectionally consistent relationships and greatly simplifies change tracking required for Submit. <br />Dinesh Kulkarni<br />(PM, RIA Services)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com